论文部分内容阅读
2005年3月1日,高某一纸诉状将西安市物价局告上莲湖区法院。该院于4月19日依法公开开庭审理,并于5月9日下发裁定书,驳回原告起诉。原告不服,提出上诉,同时,追加陕西省物价局为被告。西安市中院依法组成合议庭进行了审理,于6月24日下发裁定书,驳回原告上诉,维持原裁定。本裁定为终审裁定。至此,这场打了近四个月的民告官行政诉讼案以西安市物价局胜诉而终结。打赢了官司,是一件可贺可喜的事情。作为被告的委托诉讼代理人,我认为很好的回顾总结这场诉讼案的全过程,对于促进价格部门依法行政有一定的益处。
March 1, 2005, a high paper sued the Xi’an Municipal Price Bureau Lianhu District Court. The court held a public hearing on April 19 and issued a ruling on May 9 dismissing the plaintiff’s prosecution. The plaintiff refused to accept the appeal and appealed to the Shaanxi Provincial Price Bureau as the defendant. The Intermediate People’s Court of Xi’an organized a collegial panel according to law and handed down a ruling on June 24, dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal and upholding the original ruling. This ruling is a final ruling. At this point, this fight for nearly four months civil sue administrative litigation case ended in Xi’an City Price Bureau. Win a lawsuit, is a welcome thing. As the defendant’s agent, I think it is very good to review and summarize the whole process of this lawsuit, which has certain benefits for promoting the administration of the price department according to law.