论文部分内容阅读
目的:修订客体依恋问卷并在中国大学生群体中检验其信效度。方法:对1 350名大学生施测客体依恋问卷中文版、囤积行为量表、依恋焦虑量表及情感依恋量表，28 d后对其中的100人实施客体依恋问卷中文版重测。项目分析、相关分析、探索性因素分析和信度分析等采用SPSS 24.0，验证性因素分析、聚敛效度分析等采用AMOS 21.0。结果:探索性因素分析发现，修订后的客体依恋问卷中文版包含2个维度12个条目。验证性因素分析发现，两因素模型拟合良好(n χ2/n df＝3.76，GFI＝0.93，CFI＝0.90，TLI＝0.87，IFI＝0.90，RMSEA＝0.08)。外部效度及聚敛效度检验表明，客体依恋问卷中文版与依恋焦虑量表、囤积行为量表及情感依恋量表均呈显著正相关(n r＝0.22，0.34，0.63，均n P<0.01，CR＝0.74~0.85，n P<0.01，AVE＝0.29~0.39，n P<0.01)。信度检验结果显示，客体依恋问卷中文版的分半信度为0.60~0.76(n P<0.01)；Cronbach’s α系数为0.78~0.83(n P<0.01)；重测信度为0.87~0.97(n P<0.01)。n 结论:修订后的客体依恋问卷中文版符合心理测量学要求，信效度指标良好。“,”Objective:To offer a revised Chinese version of the object attachment questionnaire(OAQ), and to examine its reliability and validity in Chinese college students.Methods:Totally 1 350 college students were tested with the Chinese version of OAQ, Chinese version of the saving inventory-revised scale(SI-R), experiences in close relationships inventory(ECR) and emotion attachment questionnaire(EAQ). A total of 100 college students from the sample were followed to complete the Chinese version of OAQ after 4 weeks.Item analysis, correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis and reliability test were conducted by SPSS 24.0 software, while confirmatory factor nalaysis and convergent validity were conducted by AMOS 21.0.Results:The exploratory factor analysis showed that Chinese version of OAQ included two factors and twelve items.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model fitted well(n χ2/n df=3.76, GFI=0.93, CFI=0.90, TLI=0.87, IFI=0.90, RMSEA=0.08). The OAQ positively correlated with SI-R, ECR and EAQ (n r=0.22, 0.34, 0.63, all n P<0.01, CR=0.74-0.85,n P<0.01.AVE=0.29-0.39,n P<0.01). The OAQ had good internal reliability with Cronbach’s α coefficients from 0.78 to 0.83, retest reliability coefficients from 0.87 to 0.97 and split-half reliability coefficients from 0.60 to 0.76(alln P<0.01).n Conclusion:The Chinese version of OAQ has acceptable reliability and validity.