论文部分内容阅读
8月3日,云南昭通鲁甸发生6.5级地震。成都高新减灾研究所一套名为“ICL”的地震预警系统为昭通市区和昆明分别提供了10秒、57秒预警,触发了分布在云南省境内昆明、昭通、丽江,四川省境内宜宾、凉山、乐山等地26所学校的警报。消息一出争议四起。许多民众认为仅仅26所学校收到警报范围有限;有专家称类似预警意义不大,最需要逃生的极震区内居民,从理论与技术上几乎都不可能在地震波到来之前收到预警;还有学者从法律层面提出如何界定地震预警的合法性问题,毕竟如果预警错误,可能给生产
On August 3, a magnitude 6.5 earthquake struck Lu Zhan, Zhaotong, Yunnan Province. A set of earthquake early warning system named “ICL” provided a 10-second and 57-second early warning for Zhaotong city and Kunming respectively, triggering the distribution of early warnings in Kunming, Zhaotong, Lijiang and Sichuan provinces in Yunnan Province Yibin, Liangshan, Leshan and other schools 26 warning. The news came in a controversial four. Many people think that only 26 schools receive a limited range of warnings. Some experts said that residents in the extremely shock-prone area, which are of little significance to early warning and most in need of refuge, can hardly receive any warnings prior to the arrival of the earthquake wave in both theory and technology. Some scholars put forward from the legal level how to define the legitimacy of earthquake warning, after all, if the warning error, may give the production