清人宋荦购得明代毛晋原藏的宋嘉定刊本施元之、顾禧、施宿的《注东坡先生诗》,由诗人邵长蘅整理。邵除删节尚存的三十卷原文之外,还与李必恒对所缺的十二卷进行补注。邵长蘅将补注的重点放在典故的出处方面,指出注苏诗之典是一大难题,并对引诗注诗的风气持保留态度,所补典故出处往往早于宋代的苏诗类注本,还补注了类注本完全失注或不够全面之处。邵长蘅还进一步辨正了类注本的错误,首先批判了分类体例,继而又撰《王注正讹》,驳正了类注本所引之文与原文不符、所引篇名不正确、因附会苏诗而改动原文、所注与事实不符等错误,但同时也存在误驳旧注、持论过苛、态度偏激、学力有限等失误。 Qing Dynasty Song 荦 purchase of the Ming Dynasty Mao Jin original collection of the Song Jiading Shi Shi Yuan, Gu Xi, Shi Su “Notes Mr. Dong Po poem,” poet Shao Chang 蘅 finishing. Shao addition to the abolition of the remaining thirty volumes of the original text, but also with Li Biheng on the missing twelve volumes for remarks. Shao Chang-tung will focus on the remarks of the allusions, pointing out that the classic notes of poetry is a major challenge, and the poetry of poetic poems hold a reserved attitude, , But also re-annotated the class note completely lost or not comprehensive enough. Shao Chang-bei also further identified the error of class annotations, first of all criticized the classification system, and then wrote “Wang note is correct,” refuted the class notes of this article does not match the original text, quote cited incorrect, because attachment Su Shi poetry and change the original text, the note does not match with the fact that the error, but there are also mispicked the old note, harsh on hold, extreme attitude, limited academic ability and other mistakes.