论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同的手术方式治疗宫颈息肉的临床效果。方法选取2015年12月-2016年12月期间来本院门诊的200例宫颈息肉患者为本次的研究对象,将200例的宫颈息肉患者随机分成两组,A组的100例宫颈息肉患者采用血管钳扭除术进行手术治疗,B组的100例宫颈息肉患者采用高频电刀治疗,然后通过统计学比较分析两组宫颈息肉患者的阴道流血时间、术后半年复发率。结果B组的阴道流血时间小于A组,B组的术后半年复发率小于A组,且差异均有统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论高频电刀治疗宫颈息肉的治疗效果明显优于传统的血管钳扭除术,因此认为在基层医院临床上门诊治疗宫颈息肉患者,应该推行高频电刀治疗。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of different surgical methods in the treatment of cervical polyps. Methods A total of 200 cases of cervical polyps from our hospital from December 2015 to December 2016 were selected as the study subjects. 200 cases of cervical polyps were randomly divided into two groups. A group of 100 patients with cervical polyps Surgical treatment of vascular clamp twisting surgery, 100 cases of cervical polyps in group B using high-frequency electric knife treatment, and then compared by statistical analysis of two groups of patients with cervical polyp vaginal bleeding time, six months after the recurrence rate. Results The vaginal bleeding time in group B was less than that in group A, and the recurrence rate in group B after operation was less than that in group A (P> 0.05). Conclusion High frequency electrosurgical treatment of cervical polyp effect is obviously superior to the traditional vascular clamp torsion surgery, so that in the primary clinics outpatient treatment of cervical polyps in patients with high frequency electrosurgical treatment should be implemented.