论文部分内容阅读
常识主义刑法观以民意、实质、国情、道德等作为刑事立法和刑法解释的资源,追求刑法本土化研究,提高刑事判决的可接受性。然而,常识主义刑法观存在方法论上困境,无法解决所针对的规则主义所导致的问题。常识主义刑法解释论违反了刑法解释的法定性、明确性,失却了理性精神,与民意和政治话语纠缠不清。常识主义刑法观的意义应在于为刑法理论和实践提供了知识论,而非直接适用于司法的解释论资源。
The commonsense criminal law view takes the public opinion, the essence, the national conditions and morality as the resources of criminal legislation and criminal law interpretation, pursues the localization of criminal law and improves the acceptability of criminal judgment. However, there is a methodological dilemma in the common sense doctrine of criminal law that can not solve the problems caused by the targeted normative. Common sense doctrine interpretation of criminal law violates the legal nature of the interpretation of criminal law, clarity, loss of rational spirit, and public opinion and political discourse. The meaning of the common sense doctrine of criminal law should lie in providing epistemology for the theory and practice of criminal law, rather than being directly applicable to judicial interpretative resources.