论文部分内容阅读
民事诉讼以对席审理和辩论主义作为基本架构,缺席审判因缺失“两造对抗”这一根本性要素而成为审判制度中的例外门类。如何看待、探析并规制这样一种特殊制度,具有重要意义。我国的立法规范未严格界分对席审判与缺席审判的差异,缺乏理论的合理性和现实的可操作性,致使围绕该制度目前存在的问题提出解决措施。
Civil litigation takes prescreening and argument as the basic framework, and absent trial becomes an exception in the trial system because of the absence of the fundamental element of “confrontation”. How to treat, analyze and regulate such a special system is of great significance. The legislative norms in our country do not strictly divide the difference between the trial of the seats and the trial of absences, lacking the rationality and practicality of the theory, which leads to the solution of the problems existing in the system.