《物权法》第23条确立的物权变动一般规则不再允许当事人以特别约定排除,这一规定本身具有进步意义,但是不能据此认为所有权保留制度已无适用的空间。我国关于物权变动的系列相关规定在表述上一直不注重意思要素;《物权法》规定的三种观念交付方式的适用范围应予明确。 The general rule of the change of real right established in Article 23 of the Property Law no longer allows the parties to exclude them by special agreement. This provision itself is of progressive significance. However, it can not be considered that the ownership retention system has no applicable space. China’s series of relevant provisions on changes in real rights in the expression has not paid attention to elements of meaning; “Property Law” provides the concept of delivery of the three concepts should be clear.