论文部分内容阅读
清水在1998年12月16日《中国青年报》上撰文说,在一份全国性报纸最近刊载的文章中,记者针对某县实施“南瓜战略”给农民造成巨大损失的事件评论说:“工作中的决策失误和形式主义加重了农民负担,挫伤了农民生产积极性,客观上等于剥夺了农民的经营自主权。在一些地方,甚至造成了干群关系紧张的局面,直接影响到当地政府的形象。”这样一段批评,基本反映了当前舆论监督的认识水平:点到权利侵夺这一层面是法治意识的进步;但“形式主义”、“政府形象”云云,似乎还停留在“工作作风”层面上。也正是因为后者,不可能真正触及政府侵权责任问题。文章认为,既然农民享有经营自主权,那么剥夺这一权利是什么行为?公民享有不可侵犯的生存权利。
In an article published recently in a national newspaper, Shui Shui wrote in an article entitled “China Youth Daily” on December 16, 1998 that the reporter commented on the incident that “a strong pumpkin strategy” has inflicted huge losses on farmers in a county: The mistakes in decision-making and formalism at work aggravate the burden on peasants, dampen the enthusiasm of peasants and objectively deprive peasants of their autonomy in running businesses, and in some places they even cause tensions between cadres and the masses and directly affect the local The image of the government. “Such a criticism basically reflects the level of current public opinion supervision: from the point of view to the level of the right to the invasion is the improvement of the awareness of the rule of law; but” formalism “and” government image “ Still stuck in ”work style " level. It is precisely because of the latter, it is impossible to really touch on the issue of government tort liability. The article holds that since peasants enjoy the right of management, what is the deprivation of this right? Citizens enjoy the inviolable right to subsistence.