本案中胡某因其子高考落榜,出资委托薛某为其子操办取得就读某科技大学长沙学院国防生名额,后因薛某未办成功,而起诉受托人返还所支付的费用。近日,二审厦门市中级人民法院判决认为,委托他人操办高考落榜生就读国防生的事项本身就是一种违法行为,因此双方委托合同应认定为无效。委托人向法院诉求受托人返还所预付的处理委托事务费用,法院应予以支持。 In this case, Humou because of his son college entrance examination, funding commissioned by Xuemou for his son to do gymnastics Changsha University admission to a University of Science and Technology places, after Xuemou not successful, and prosecutors trustee returned the fees paid. Recently, the second instance of the Xiamen Intermediate People’s Court held that entrusting others to run a college entrance exam for undergraduates in defense affairs is an illegal act in itself. Therefore, both sides commissioned a contract should be deemed invalid. The client requests the court to return the prepaid fee for handling the entrusted transaction to the trustee, and the court shall support it.