论文部分内容阅读
在自然权利理论的发展历程中,古典自然权利理论与现代自然权利理论是有着巨大的差异的,从政治哲学的角度来讲,这个差异是从霍布斯开始的,他否定了古典政治“人天生就是政治动物”的假设,指出人的本性即是自我保全,否定了古典政治所认为的:人只有在政治生活中才能实现最高的善,指出了个人权利的正当性。在霍布斯看来,自然权利既是政治原则又是道德原则,它既是建立国家的目的,又是社会的正义所在。
In the course of the development of the theory of natural rights, there is a huge difference between the classical theory of natural rights and the modern theory of natural rights. From a political philosophy point of view, this difference starts from Hobbes and he denies classical politics. Human beings are inherently political animals ", pointing out that the nature of human beings is self-preservation, which denies the classical politics that man can achieve supreme good only in political life and points out the legitimacy of individual rights. To Hobbes, natural rights are both political principles and moral principles. They are both the purpose of establishing a nation and the justness of society.