论文部分内容阅读
传统伦理学关于道德决策合理性的论证基本上是遵循康德主义和功利主义来展开的,康德主义理论所特有的抽象性、功利主义对个体分离的漠视,使得传统道德决策的合理性建立在对人类复杂的伦理经验之抽象基础之上,从而失去了对人类伦理生活原有的复杂性保持敏感关注的能力。当代著名伦理学家威廉姆斯对这两个流派的批判,以及在此基础上提出的以个人生活计划作为个体道德决策合理性来源的观点,为我们重新审视道德合理性提供了一个很有启发的视角。
The traditional ethics argumentation on the rationality of moral decision-making basically follows Kantianism and utilitarianism. The unique abstractness of Kantism theory and the ignorance of utilitarianism on individual separation make the rationality of traditional moral decision-making reasonable. The abstract basis of human complex ethical experience, thus losing the ability to remain sensitive to the original complexities of human ethical life. The critique of these two genres by contemporary famous ethicist William Williams and his argument that individual life planning as a source of rationality for individual moral decision-making based on this provide a great inspiration for us to reexamine the moral rationality Perspective.