有这样一个故事:7个人的一个集体,食物比较匮乏,每次吃饭都由一个人给大家分。开始是专由某一人分,他总是给自己分得多,另外的人分得多少则以谁与他是否亲近而定。这样的分配当然不公了。后来大家决定推举一个公道的人给大家分。这人起始也果然公道,但不久除了给自己分得多外,对其他人也看碟子下菜了。后来通过推举又换了几个人也都这样。大家觉得这种办法不行,决定轮流分,每人一天值日。但轮到谁分,谁就给自己多分,对其他人也因人而异——当然是以同自己关系如何而异了。虽然每人都能轮到这样的机会,从这个意义上说这还算是公 There is such a story: a group of seven individuals, the food is scarce, each meal is divided by a person to you. The beginning is dedicated to a person, he always points to himself more, the other is divided by how many who are close to him and may be. Of course, this distribution of unfair. Later, everyone decided to recommend a fair person to everyone. The beginning of this man was also fair, but in the near future, apart from giving himself more, he also looked at dishes for other people. Later, through the nomination and changed a few people as well. We think this approach does not work, decided to take turns, each day value day. But whoever turns, who give yourself more points, others vary from person to person - of course, is how different with their own relationship. Although each person can turn this opportunity, in this sense it is fairly public