论文部分内容阅读
《历史研究》2014年第2期“读史札记”栏目发表的戴伟华《〈使至塞上〉与崔希逸破吐蕃事无关》一文(以下简称“戴文”)说,两《唐书》及《资治通鉴》(以下简称《通鉴》)所载,河西节度使崔希逸破吐蕃的时间在开元二十五年(737)二月或三月有误,根据《全唐文》卷352樊衡《河西破蕃贼露布》(下文简称《露布》)这一“极其珍贵”的史料,崔希逸破吐蕃的时间应在开元二十五年十二月。戴文的结论是:“(崔希逸)袭击吐蕃时间不是《通鉴》、两《唐书》所说的二月或三月。旧史所记时间是误读,十二月写为二月或三月,并无深意。据吐蕃
Dai Weihua’s article ”Historical Notes“ published in the section entitled ”History Studies“ No. 2 of 2014 in ”Reading History Notes,“ said (”Dai Wenhua“) that two Tangs Book ”and“ Zi Zhi Tong Jian ”(hereinafter referred to as“ Tong Jian ”), Hexi Jiedhi Cui Xiyi break Tufan time in Kaiyuan twenty-five years (February 737) February or March is wrong, according to“ This historical data of ”extremely valuable“ by Fan Huan, ”Fanxi Thief in Lujiazui, Hexi“ (hereinafter referred to as ”Luobu“), Cui Xianyi broke the Tibetan government should be in December 25, Kaiyuan. Dai Wen’s conclusion is: ”Attack on Tubo’s time is not“ Tongjian, ”and“ Tang book, ”said in February or March. The time in old history is misread, December is February Or March, there is no meaning. According Tubo