1.引言直到新近,盛行的居支配地位的增长理论,是分开地计算增加的劳动和资本的贡献和试图来解释极大的剩余。这曾被卢卡斯(1988)、阿布拉莫维茨(1989)、舒尔茨(1988)、罗默(1989a)、斯科特(1989、1991)及别的人所批评,因为它与观察到的与增长相伴随的普遍化的现象不一致,或因为它对所观察与增长相伴随的普遍化的现象提供了不合适的解 1. Introduction Until recently, the dominant dominance of growth theory was to separately account for the contribution of increased labor and capital and to try to explain the great surplus. This was criticized by Lucas (1988), Abramowitz (1989), Schultz (1988), Romer (1989a), Scott (1989, 1991) and others because it relates to Observed inconsistencies with the generalization of growth or because it provides an inappropriate solution to the generalization of observed and increased phenomena