论文部分内容阅读
目的分析和探讨妇产科临床上对于剖宫产术后腹壁子宫内膜异位症患者的临床治疗方法 ,以期为该疾病的临床治疗提供借鉴。方法对98例剖宫产术后腹壁子宫内膜异位症患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,采用随机数表的方法将其随机分成常规组(40例)和手术组(58例),常规组患者采用药物治疗,手术组患者采用外科手术进行治疗,比较两组患者临床治疗的总有效率以及不良反应率。结果常规组患者临床治疗的总有效率为77.50%(31/40),手术组患者临床治疗的总有效率为96.55%(56/58),两组总有效率比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01);常规组患者临床治疗的不良反应率为15.00%(6/40),手术组患者临床治疗的不良反应率为3.45%(2/58),两组不良反应情况比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论本研究结果表明妇产科临床上对于剖宫产术后腹壁子宫内膜异位症患者采用外科手术治疗的临床效果显著优于保守的药物治疗,因此值得临床推广使用。
Objective To analyze and discuss the clinical treatment of obstetrics and gynecology in patients with abdominal wall endometriosis after cesarean section, with a view to provide reference for the clinical treatment of the disease. Methods The clinical data of 98 patients with abdominal wall endometriosis after cesarean section were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into routine group (40 cases) and operation group (58 cases) using random number table. The patients in the group were treated with drugs. The patients in the operation group were treated with surgery. The total effective rate and adverse reaction rate in the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of clinical treatment was 77.50% (31/40) in the conventional group and 96.55% (56/58) in the surgical group. The total effective rate of the two groups was statistically significant ( P <0.01). Adverse reaction rate was 15.00% (6/40) in the routine group and 3.45% (2/58) in the clinical group. There was significant difference between the two groups in adverse reactions Statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion The results of this study show that obstetrics and gynecology clinically for surgical treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis patients after cesarean section was significantly better than the conservative treatment of surgical treatment, it is worth promoting the use of the clinic.