论文部分内容阅读
目的分析口腔术后患者的疼痛护理。方法选取2012年~2014年我院收治的口腔术后患者67例,将其分为观察组37例与对照组30例。观察组采用地佐辛治疗,对照组采用西乐葆治疗,比较两种方法的止痛效果,并使用评估图由二合一疼痛测量图表的方法描述,分别记录手术后静息状态下切口疼痛评分。采用Fisher确切概率法,观察止痛效果及不良反应。结论静脉止痛效果因其直接作用于中枢术后即开始使用镇痛效果要比口服类好,但口服止痛副作用比静脉使用止痛药副作用要小。
Objective To analyze the pain management of patients after oral surgery. Methods Sixty-seven cases of oral surgery admitted from 2012 to 2014 in our hospital were divided into observation group (37 cases) and control group (30 cases). The observation group was treated with dezocine and the control group with Celebrex. The analgesic effects of the two methods were compared and evaluated using a two-in-one pain measurement chart using the evaluation chart. The incision pain scores at rest after surgery were recorded. Using Fisher’s exact test, analgesic effect and adverse reactions were observed. Conclusions Intravenous analgesic effect is more effective than oral medication because of its direct effect on central surgery. However, the side effects of oral analgesic analgesia are smaller than those of intravenous analgesics.