论文部分内容阅读
明清之际的思想家陈确著有《大学辨》,并与同门张履祥就《大学》真伪论辩多年。探析他们论辩的具体过程及其学术趋向与观点差异,可以看出二人在清初学术转型之中,出于对师说的不同理解而产生了学术分歧。陈确趋向于陆王心学而其《大学辨》以考证方法解决义理问题,体现了清初学术由理学到朴学的转型;张履祥趋向于程朱理学而以躬行践履著称,其尊朱黜王思想对康熙朝理学有较大的影响。
In the Ming and Qing dynasties, the thinker Chen Qizhun made the distinction between “university identification” and Chang Fusiang with the same door on the “university” for many years. Exploring the specific process of their argument and its differences in academic trends and perspectives, it can be seen that during the academic transition in early Qing Dynasty, the two had different academic disagreements due to their different understanding of teacher’s theory. Chen indeed tended to Lu Wang Xin Xue and his “University Discrimination” to solve the problem of justice by means of textual research, reflecting the transition of Neo-Confucianism from Neo-Confucianism to Park Learning in the early Qing dynasty. Zhang Luxiang tended to Cheng and Zhu Neo-Confucianism, Kangxi dynasty had a greater impact on the science.