论文部分内容阅读
在对被追诉人的权利保障机制中,对刑讯逼供的证明机制的规定是极其重要的一个部分。对刑讯逼供存在与否的证明属于程序性事项的证明,涉及到一般的证明标准和程序性裁判中的证明机制问题。刑讯逼供的事实具有特殊性,这种特殊性使对这种事实的证明在实践中很难完成,因此应当明确:刑事实体法追诉中的刑讯逼供证明的证明责任由新的公诉机关承担,证明标准也应与普通案件中的证明标准有所不同,同时,法官不应承担证明责任。
Provisions on the proof mechanism of extorting a confession by torture are an extremely important part of the system of safeguarding the rights of the person sought. Proof of existence or absence of extorting a torture is a proof of procedural matters, involving both general proof standards and proof mechanisms in procedural adjudication. The fact that the torture is confession has its own particularity. This particularity makes the proof of this fact difficult to be accomplished in practice. Therefore, it should be clear that the burden of proof on torture proof in prosecution of criminal substantive law is borne by the new prosecutorial organ, The standard should also differ from the standard of proof in ordinary cases, and judges should not bear the burden of proof.