论文部分内容阅读
有关建造令入迷惑不解的埃及金字塔的各种方法的假设,正如世界一样古老:远在公元前5世纪古希腊历史学家、被誉为“历史之父”的希罗多德就提出过建造埃及金字塔的假设。今天,美国雕塑家、书画插图家马丁·埃斯莱尔对此又提出了新的解释。埃斯莱尔的新假设引起了各国专家的浓厚兴趣,因为它驳斥了最流行的观点:金字塔是借助干巨大斜面建造的,奴隶们沿这斜面搬运每块重达10吨以上的巨型石块。埃斯莱尔认为,如此建造埃及金字塔无疑是一项危险、漫长而又异常艰巨复杂的工程,需要耗费
The assumptions of the various ways of building an confusing Egyptian pyramid are as old as the world: Herodotus, an ancient Greek historian who was hailed as the “father of history,” was far away in the 5th century BC. Put forward the hypothesis of building an Egyptian pyramid. Today, Martin Esler, the American sculptor and illustrator of calligraphy and painting, has proposed a new explanation for this. Eisler’s new hypothesis has aroused the interest of experts from various countries because it dismisses the most popular view: the pyramid was built on huge dry slopes where the slaves carried each giant stone weighing more than 10 tons. . Esler believes that the construction of the Egyptian Pyramid in this way is undoubtedly a dangerous, lengthy and extremely difficult and complex project that requires cost