论文部分内容阅读
这是我以律师身份执业后第一起全程负责的案件。从案件性质上来讲,本案的法律关系非常简单,即基本的物业服务合同法律关系,业主接受物业服务,应当缴纳物业费。但在现实生活中,尤其是在前几年,很多小区的前期物业公司都是开发商的子公司,即使开发商拥有大量自留物业,也很少能被追讨物业费,这实际上已经严重侵犯了那些已缴费业主的合法权益。在本案,开发商自留了会所、俱乐部等物业面积5000多平方米,累计拖欠物业费近40万元。在前期物业公司
This is the first case in which I am responsible for my practice as a lawyer. From the nature of the case, the legal relationship of the case is very simple, that is, the basic legal relationship of the property service contract, the owners accept the property services, property fees should be paid. However, in real life, especially in previous years, the early property companies in many districts are subsidiaries of developers. Even if developers own a large number of self-owned properties, they can rarely be recouped for property fees. In fact, Serious infringement of those who have paid the legitimate rights and interests of owners. In this case, the developers retained the clubhouse, clubs and other property area of over 5,000 square meters, owed nearly 40 million total property costs. In the early property company