论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比观察治疗宫颈糜烂4种方法的疗效和不良反应。方法:将宫颈糜烂109例随机分为4组,分别采用BBT 妇科多功能射频治疗仪治疗30 例,冷冻法治疗27 例,波姆光治疗24 例,激光治疗28例,观察各组的疗效及术后不良反应。结果:BBT 妇科多功能射频治疗组治愈率96. 7%,好转率3. 3%;冷冻治疗组治愈率74 .1%,好转率25 .9%;波姆光治疗组治愈率87 5%,好转率12. 5%;激光治疗组治愈率76 .8%,好转率21. 4%。波姆光治疗组的阴道出血时间最短、阴道排液量最少、创面愈合也最快。结论:4种治疗方法中,BBT妇科多功能射频治疗仪的治愈率最高,波姆光治疗的不良反应最小。
Objective: To compare and observe the curative effect and adverse reactions of four methods of treating cervical erosion. Methods: 109 patients with cervical erosion were randomly divided into 4 groups. BBT gynecological multifunctional radiofrequency ablation instrument was used in 30 cases, frozen method in 27 cases, Bomu light in 24 cases, laser treatment in 28 cases. The curative effect and Postoperative adverse reactions. Results: The cure rate of BBT gynecological multifunctional radiofrequency treatment group was 96.7%, the improvement rate was 3.3%; the cure rate of cryotherapy group was 74.1%, the improvement rate was 25.9%; the cure rate of BUMM group was 87.5% , Improvement rate of 12.5%; laser treatment group cure rate of 76.8%, improvement rate of 21.4%. Perm light treatment group, the shortest vaginal bleeding time, vaginal discharge the least, the wound healing is also the fastest. Conclusion: The BBT gynecological multifunctional radiofrequency ablation device has the highest cure rate among the four treatment methods, and the least adverse effect of the photocoagulation treatment of the photocoagulation.