论文部分内容阅读
社会已经进入多元化时代,利益差异日益明显,利益主体意识日益增强,相互之间的利益冲突不可避免,要求基层政府必须对日益增强的利益诉求意愿做出积极的回应。这既是社会管理创新的原动力,也决定了社会管理创新的目标和路径:变革中国原有的“政府包揽式”社会管理模式,提高多元参与水平以及对利益差异和利益冲突的包容能力,形成“多元协作式”社会管理体制势在必然。这种“多元协作式”社会管理包含两个层面:一是管理主体的多元;二是管理工具的多元。本文以极具代表性的“苏南”的苏州和“苏北”的淮安为样本,各选取两个社会管理创新的案例,从结构、过程和类型三个层面比较两地社会管理创新的差异,评估实践成效,揭示创新规律,探究发展趋势,并在此基础上提出对策建议。
Society has entered a pluralistic era with increasingly obvious differences in interests, increasing awareness of stakeholders, and inevitable conflicts of interest between each other. It demands that grassroots governments respond positively to the desire for increasing interest. This is not only the driving force behind innovation in social management, but also the goal and path of social management innovation: reforming China’s existing “government-run” social management model, raising the level of multiple participation and inclusiveness to differences in interests and conflicts of interest, It is imperative to form a “multi-coordinated” social management system. This “multi-collaborative” social management includes two levels: First, the diversity of management subjects; the second is the diversity of management tools. This paper takes the representative “Su-Nan” Suzhou and “Northern Jiangsu” Huaian as samples, and selects two cases of social management innovation from the three levels of structure, process and type to compare the two communities Management innovation differences, assess the effectiveness of practice, reveal the law of innovation, explore the development trend, and on this basis, put forward countermeasures and suggestions.