论文部分内容阅读
近几年来,火灾原因调查的新理论、新方法不断见诸报刊,有的运用先进的仪器测试化验,有的进行模拟实际试验。有的用逻辑理论推理分析,有的使用刑侦手段破获疑案。尽管如此,用消防基础理论解释火因仍不失为一种行之有效的方法。只要消防工作者业务理论功底扎实,也可用基础现论解释火灾疑案。本文拟将运用基础理论确定火因的实例写出来,供同行们参考,若有不对之处,万望指正。 1991年12月15日,准备开业的南京丽都饭店发生特大火灾。市消防支队“119”台于凌晨5时30分接警后,迅速调集7个消防中队,23辆消防车,162名消防官兵赶往现场扑救。消防官兵一面从烈烟熊熊的大堂攻入,一面冒着浓烟升梯从三、四楼强攻,用45分钟扑灭大火,疏散和抢救15名遇险者。这些人员大多已昏迷,是消防队员将他们抬至屋顶楼面,再用云梯救下的。但火灾仍造成了6人死亡,8人受伤,直接经济损
In recent years, new theories and methods of fire investigation have been found in newspapers and periodicals. Some have used advanced instrument testing and testing, and some have carried out actual experiments. Some use logical reasoning analysis, and some use of criminal investigation means to break the suspect. In spite of this, it is still an effective way to explain the cause of fire by using the basic theory of fire protection. As long as the solid foundation of the firefighter business theory can also be used to explain the basic theory of fire suspect. This article intends to use the basic theory to determine the cause of fire written examples for colleagues for reference, if wrong, Wan Wang correction. December 15, 1991, preparing to open the Nanjing Lido Hotel a big fire. City Fire Brigade “119” Taiwan at 5:30 after the alarm, quickly mobilized seven fire squadron, 23 fire engines, 162 fire officers rushed to the scene fighting. Fire officers and soldiers from the raging lobby scored one side, while risking smoke smoke from the third and fourth floor storm, with 45 minutes to extinguish the fire evacuation and rescue of 15 people in distress. Most of these people have been unconscious, firefighters carried them to the rooftop floor, and then use the ladder rescue. However, the fire still resulted in 6 deaths and 8 injuries, a direct economic loss