论文部分内容阅读
“醉驾”入刑的目的是希望通过严惩“醉驾”人,以刑罚威慑力遏制近年来持续高发的“醉驾”案件。但在司法实践中,由于该罪刚被纳入刑法规范,设立时间较短,既无法定量刑情节,又无参考指导案例,因此定罪量刑标准难以统一,法官的自由裁量权过大,导致司法实践问题重重。一方面可能让醉驾者抱有侥幸心理,“醉驾”入刑威慑效果大打折扣。另外也可能导致司法腐败,权力寻租等问题的出现,“醉驾”定罪量刑标准化迫在眉睫。在本文,笔者从我国醉驾入刑的立法背景及目前司法实践存在的不足着笔,就“醉驾”入刑定罪量刑标准化提出自己的一点拙见。
“Drunk driving ” The purpose of the sentence is to punish “drunk driving ” people, to deter punishment deterrence in recent years continued high incidence “drunk driving ” case. However, in the judicial practice, because the crime has just been incorporated into the criminal law, the establishment of a relatively short period of time, it can not quantify the circumstances of the penalty and no reference guide cases, so the standard of conviction and sentencing is difficult to unify, the judge’s discretion is too large, leading to judicial practice Problems. On the one hand may allow drunk drivers have luck, “drunk driving ” deterrent effect greatly reduced. In addition it may lead to judicial corruption, power rent-seeking and other issues appear, “drunk driving ” conviction the standardization of sentencing is imminent. In this paper, the author from the legislative background of our country drunk driving into the penalty and the existing shortcomings of judicial practice, pen “drunk driving ” standardization of sentencing sentencing put forward my own humble opinion.