试析妇科疾病治疗的微创理念与微创手术

来源 :深圳中西医结合杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wangql133
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究腹腔镜微创手术在妇科疾病治疗中的应用价值。方法:随机选取2013年1月至2015年4月间我院收治的由于妇科疾病行腹腔镜微创手术患者72例为观察组,同期行开腹手术患者72例为对照组,对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛持续时间、术后并发症发生率、术后住院天数各项内容。结果:观察组手术时间、术后疼痛时间以及住院时间均显著短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率为1.4%少于对照组的11.1%,组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜技术与开腹手术相比,创伤更小,疗效更优,具有显著的优越性,腹腔镜手术取代传统开腹手术也是必然趋势,在妇科治疗中,微创理念及微创手术也会得到更普遍的应用。 Objective: To explore the value of laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of gynecological diseases. Methods: Seventy-two patients undergoing laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery due to gynecological diseases were randomly selected from January 2013 to April 2015 in our hospital. 72 patients undergoing open surgery during the same period were selected as control group. Time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative pain, the incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative hospital days. Results: The operation time, postoperative pain time and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group. The blood loss in the operation group was less than that in the control group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05) The incidence of disease was 1.4% less than that of the control group (11.1%). There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery has less trauma and better curative effect, and has obvious advantages. Laparoscopic surgery replaces traditional open surgery is an inevitable trend. In gynecological treatment, minimally invasive surgery and minimally invasive surgery Will get more general application.
其他文献