论文部分内容阅读
悬赏广告的性质和效力曾有理论争议,但司法层面上已经统一。《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国合同法〉若干问题的解释(二)》第三条规定:“悬赏人以公开方式声明对完成一定行为的人支付报酬,完成特定行为的人请求悬赏人支付报酬
There have been theoretical controversies about the nature and effectiveness of the reward advertising, but the judicial level has been unified. Article 3 of the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China (II) Article 3 states that: ”The remunerant makes a public offering to remunerate the person who has completed a certain course of action for the purpose of offering a reward Man pays the remuneration