论文部分内容阅读
牛顿认为,“我看得比别人更远,那是因为我站在巨人的肩上”。而奥尔特加认为,随着社会大众群体的崛起,社会大众将成为社会的主流群体。那么,在学术研究领域,是社会大众还是“巨人”(学术精英)构成科学研究的中坚力量,并引导了学科的发展?本文以社会科学领域的图书情报学和工程技术领域的纳米技术为例,分别采集图书情报学和纳米技术领域的高被引文献数据,以及图书情报学和纳米技术领域的学术精英(图书情报学的5位普赖斯奖获得者和纳米技术领域的5位诺贝尔奖获得者)——获奖者所发表的文献数据。然后,通过检索选取文献的参考文献的被引次数数据得出如下结论:第一,高被引文献引用了更多的高被引文献;第二,学术精英也偏向引用高被引文献。研究结论支持了牛顿假说。
Newton thinks, “I see farther than others, it is because I stand on the shoulders of giants ”. Ortega argues that with the rise of the general public, the general public will become the mainstream of society. So, in the field of academic research, is the general public or the “giant” (academic elite) constitute the backbone of scientific research and guide the development of the discipline? In this paper, the field of social science and engineering library of Library and Information Science nanotechnology For example, highly citation-oriented data collected in the fields of library and information science and nanotechnology, as well as academic elites in the fields of library and information science and nanotechnology (5 Prize winners in library and information science and 5 in nanotechnology Nobel laureate) - Literature data published by the winners. Then, by retrieving the citation data of selected references, the following conclusions are drawn: First, highly cited documents cite more highly cited documents; second, academic elites also tend to cite highly cited documents. The conclusion of the study supports Newton’s hypothesis.