醛氢叶酸/5—氟尿嘧啶两种用法毒性比较

来源 :中国肿瘤临床与康复 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:aonHdt6b
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的比较两种CF/5—FU合用方法的不良反应。方法把104例消化道恶性肿瘤患者分为两组,都给予含有CF/5—FU加顺铂等的联合化疗:A组66例CF静滴中途推注5—FU(疗法A),B组38例依次滴注CF和5—FU(疗法B),观察两种用法的不良反应。结果A组约1/3患者发生严重消化道粘膜损伤,口腔溃疡、腹痛腹泻和皮肤色素沉着明显高于B组(P<0.005),其中5例死于不能控制的腹泻和发热所引起的休克。白细胞减少发生率也显著高于B组(P<0.05)。B组只有13%患者出现一过性轻度腹泻,静脉炎的发生率显著高于A组(P<0.005)。两种CF/5—FU用法不良反应有显著差异。结论疗法A可引起严重不良反应,建议谨慎使用。 Objective To compare the adverse reactions of two combined CF/5-FU methods. Methods One hundred and four patients with malignant tumors of the digestive tract were divided into two groups. All patients were given combined chemotherapy with CF/5-FU plus cisplatin: 66 CF infusions in group A were injected with 5-FU (treatment A), group B 38 patients were infused with CF and 5-FU (treatment B) in order to observe the adverse reactions of both usages. Results Approximately 1/3 of patients in group A developed severe gastrointestinal mucosal lesions, and oral ulcers, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and skin pigmentation were significantly higher than those in group B (P < 0.005), and 5 of them died of uncontrolled diarrhea and fever. Shock. The incidence of leukopenia was also significantly higher than that of group B (P<0.05). Only transiently mild diarrhea occurred in 13% of patients in group B, and the incidence of phlebitis was significantly higher than in group A (P<0.005). There were significant differences in the adverse effects of the two CF/5-FU administrations. Conclusion Treatment A can cause severe adverse reactions and it is recommended to use it with caution.
其他文献
以新颁布的《有机产品认证实施规则》为依据,比对新旧《规则》版本的区别,理解新《规则》的新特点,分析对有机产品认证机构和认证企业提出的新要求。
结合黄/绿线多年生产与测量实践:剖析组合色色比不合格的状况;介绍三种组合色色比的简易检测方法及两个建议。
为了进一步规范和统一关于产品环境绩效评价,推动建立统一的绿色产品市场,欧盟启动了产品环境足迹评价(PEF)工作。本文介绍了产品环境足迹评价工作从启动到目前为止的进展情况,并
当前志愿服务模式存在的痛点主要有志愿服务有效供给与匹配效果不佳、志愿服务组织专业化能力建设不足、个体志愿行为激励与保障不完善、志愿服务资源整合与共享不充分4个方
2007年是乳腺影像学飞速发展的一年,今年乳腺影像方面的文章数量比去年明显增多,除外乳腺放射治疗部分,达到了108篇。与往年相比,有如下更新:一、将MR技术作为单独的讨论主题;二、