论文部分内容阅读
文章在分析河北省承接国内产业转移现状的基础上,检验京、津、冀产业转移互动关系,结果显示:虽然国际产业转移促进了京、津产业结构调整和升级,但1996年以来,其影响的途径主要通过进出口贸易而非直接投资,直接投资反而对京、津产业结构的调整和升级产生了负面作用,同时,虽然京、津在河北省吸纳国内投资中占优势地位,但京、津产业结构调整并未明显促进其对河北省的投资,三地自身经济发展所带来的区域间贸易和投资机会成为拉动京、津、冀区域间投资的主要动力。
Based on the analysis of the status quo of Hebei’s inheritance of domestic industries, the article examines the interactive relations of the transfer of industries in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. The results show that although the international industrial transfer has promoted the industrial restructuring and upgrading of Beijing and Tianjin, Approach is mainly through import and export trade rather than direct investment. Instead, direct investment has a negative effect on the adjustment and upgrading of the industrial structure of Beijing and Tianjin. At the same time, although Beijing and Tianjin dominate domestic investment in Hebei Province, Tianjin industrial restructuring did not significantly promote its investment in Hebei Province and the inter-regional trade and investment opportunities brought by the economic development of the three regions have become the main driving force for investment in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei.