论文部分内容阅读
《收藏界》2005年5月藏界争鸣栏目发表了《长沙窑大官款碗》一文,八月份张天琚先生提出《长沙窑大官款是真品吗》的质疑,认为该碗是赝品,十月份冷香居主人以《大官款碗辨疑》作答,称根据省级文物部门专家认定及个人辨识,肯定该碗是长沙窑釉上彩。同时,栏目责编耕生鼓励藏友们参加讨论,为此,我不揣浅陋,借贵刊提供的平台,谈点个人意见,与冷香居主人商榷并求教于诸位方家。
“Collectors” in May 2005 issue of contention in the possession of the world published a “Changsha kiln official bowl” article, August Zhang Tianyi put forward “Changsha kiln official is genuine it” question that the bowl is a fake, October Leng Xiangju owner to “the official bowl suspects doubt” to answer, said according to the provincial cultural relics department experts identify and personal identification, sure the bowl is Changsha kiln glaze color. At the same time, the column editor-in-chief encourages Tibetans to participate in the discussion. To this end, I do not clumsy and use the platform provided by your magazine to talk about my opinions and discuss with the Honorable Habitat Master and seek advice from yours.