论文部分内容阅读
革命的道路是艰辛和曲折的.革命的阶级总是要经过长期的反复的斗争才能战胜(?)人,取得最后胜利.列宁说:“历史证明,从来没有一个被压迫阶级,不经过专政时期.即夺取政权并用暴力镇压剥削者的最猛烈、最疯狂、不惜采取一切罪恶手段的一贯反抗,就取得了统治,就能够取得统治.……先进国家的资产阶级也是经过一系列起义、内战,用暴力镇压国王、封建主、奴隶主及其复辟企图才取得政权的.”英国资产阶级革命从1640年开始,经过两次内战,才在1649年打败国王宣布共和,但是跟着又出现了克伦威尔的军事独裁和斯图亚特王朝的封建复辟,直到1688年,资产阶级用政变方式,从荷兰迎来一个带着海陆军的奥兰治亲王威廉为国王,才使资产阶级专政在君主立宪制的形式下稳定下来.而法国资产阶级革命则是更加长期复杂.它从1789年革命爆发到1875年第三共和国确立,经历了长达八十六年,中间交织着进步与反动,共和与帝制,革命恐怖与反革命恐怖,内战与外战,征服外国与投降外国等,尤为动荡不宁.本文仅就法兰西共和制度的确立作初步的探讨,希望同志们批评指正.
The revolutionary road is difficult and tortuous, and the revolutionary classes always have to go through long and repeated battles to win over and win the final victory. “Lenin said:” History proves that there has never been an oppressed class and no period of dictatorship . That is, to seize power and use violence to crush the most violent and craziest of exploiters and to persevere with all their evil means to gain control and rule. The bourgeoisie in advanced countries also went through a series of campaigns of uprising, civil war, To suppress the king, the feudal lord, the slave-owner, and his restoration attempt by violence. "The British bourgeois revolution began in 1640 with two civil wars to defeat the king in 1649 to declare the Republic, but followed by the emergence of Cromwell Seoul’s military dictatorship and the Stuart dynastic feudal restoration. Until 1688, the bourgeoisie took the coup d’état from the Netherlands and brought an aunt, Prince William of the Sea with the army and the sea, to make the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie in the constitutional monarchy The French bourgeois revolution is more complicated in the long run, from the eruption of the revolution in 1789 to the establishment of the Third Republic in 1875, For a long period of eighty-six years, the interweaving of progress and reaction, republicanism and monarchy, revolutionary terror and counter-revolutionary terror, civil war and foreign war, conquest of foreign countries and surrender of foreign countries, especially turmoil and restless.This article only on the establishment of the French republican system As a preliminary discussion, I hope comrades can correct criticism.