婚内强奸是否构成犯罪、构成何罪,在理论上和实务上引起了广泛的争论。形成了否定说、肯定说和折中说等三种学说。但是三种学说自身都存在一定的缺陷而无法很好地对这个问题予以解决。通过分析比较三种学说、主张,刑法应规定这种行为为“亲告罪”;司法解释应该明确规定婚姻的不同状态;合理运用刑法“但书”的功能。在处理婚内强奸问题时考虑到刑法的人文价值并兼顾到中国语境,只有这样才能对婚内强奸问题予以更好的解决。 Whether marital rape constitutes a crime or not, what constitutes a crime, has aroused widespread controversy both in theory and in practice. Formed a negative theory that must say and compromise said three kinds of theory. However, all three theories have their own defects and can not solve this problem well. By analyzing and comparing the three theories and propositions, the criminal law should stipulate that such behavior should be “guilty of crimes”; judicial interpretation should clearly stipulate the different states of marriage; and make proper use of the functions of criminal law “but the book ”. Taking into consideration the humane value of criminal law and the context of China when dealing with marital rape, the marital rape problem can be better solved.