说话是人类最自然的活动,这种活动自觉不自觉地会遵循一定的规则,以保证对话顺利进行,实现双方暂时共有的目标。但是违反会话合作原则的对话也在每天发生着。在文学作品中,作者往往利用这些非常规的对话来凸显人物的某些性格和特点,或者把它作为一种写作技巧;悬念、倒叙、夹叙夹议、反语、隐喻、夸张等写作手法无不体现了对会话原则的挑战。小说《围城》中的人物对话和叙事话语很多地方都体现了对会话原则的违背,对这些现象的研究将有助于我们把握人物性格和作品内涵,对于该小说的翻译研究也有参考价值。 Speaking is the most natural activity of mankind, and such activities consciously or unconsciously follow certain rules to ensure the smooth progress of the dialogue and achieve the goals that both parties share temporarily. But dialogue that violates the principle of dialogue and cooperation is happening every day. In literary works, the authors often use these unconventional dialogues to highlight certain characters and characteristics of characters, or use it as a writing skill; the technique of writing such as suspense, flashback, narration, irony, metaphor, exaggeration, etc. Embodies the challenge of the principle of conversation. The dialogue between the characters and the narrative discourse in the novel “Besieged City” reflects the violation of the principle of conversation in many places. The study of these phenomena will help us to grasp the characters and the connotation of the works, and is of reference value to the translation studies of the novel.