论文部分内容阅读
2009年在清华大学举办的“欧洲私法的统一及其在东亚的影响”国际研讨会开启了“亚洲合同法原则(PACL)”的合作研究,东亚地区的学者进行了长达四年的共同研究。PACL草案的“债务履行”部分与本文作者起草的“债务不履行”部分经过了多次审议。草案的“债务不履行”部分,主要着眼于债务不履行的概念的界定,把瑕疵担保责任纳入了债务不履行体系。草案规定原始不能时的合同为有效,故意及过失不再作为债务不履行的要件,区分了根本违约及非根本违约时的救济手段,只有根本违约时才可以解除合同。
In 2009, the International Symposium on the Harmonization of European Private Law and Its Impact on East Asia held at Tsinghua University opened the “Cooperative Study on the Principles of Asian Contract Law (PACL)”, and scholars in East Asia conducted a total of four Year of joint research. The “Debt Fulfillment” section of the PACL draft and the “Debt Fulfillment” section drafted by the authors of this paper have been reviewed several times. The “Debt Non-performance” part of the draft mainly focuses on the definition of the concept of debt non-performance and incorporates the liability for the flaw in the debt non-performance system. The draft stipulates that when the original contract can not be valid, intentional and negligent no longer serve as an element of debt non-performance, the fundamental breach of contract and non-fundamental relief at the time of the relief measures, only the fundamental breach of contract can be terminated.