论文部分内容阅读
最新《民事诉讼法》司法解释对于案外人民事执行异议之诉制度做出了明确具体的规定,对于诉讼、救济执行程度等都进行了明确的规定,这样使案外人民事执行异议之诉的可行性得到了提升,对于《民事诉讼法》中案外人异议权力保护具有重要的意义。但是由于案外人民事执行异议之诉是在《民事诉讼法》总体基础上进行的细化延伸修改,在执行效果上并没有突破原有制度架构的约束。在理论与执行的过程中都暴露了案外人民事执行异议之诉的潜在问题,没有形成统一的解决措施。针对这种情况要对案外人民事执行异议之诉进行详细的分析,这样才能够科学合理的构建司法体系。
The latest judicial interpretation of the Code of Civil Procedure provides clear and specific provisions on the system of objections to the execution of civil actions by foreigners and provides explicit provisions on litigation and the degree of implementation of remedies so that the outsider may execute the objection lawsuit on the basis of civil enforcement Sexuality has been promoted, which is of great significance to the protection of outsiders’ right of opposition in the Civil Procedure Law. However, since the plaintiffs’ objection to civil execution of civil action is an elaboration and extension of revision on the basis of the Civil Procedure Law, the effect of the enforcement does not break through the original institutional framework. In the course of theory and execution, all potential problems of non-compliance by civilians in civil cases were exposed, and no unified solutions were formed. In view of this situation, it is necessary to carry out a detailed analysis of the plaintiffs’ objection to the case of a non-resident and to construct a judicial system in a scientific and reasonable manner.