论文部分内容阅读
事实错误理论在刑法理论中一直占有重要的地位。行为人的主观认识与客观现实不一致的情况时有发生并且种类多样,何种行为人的事实错误能够阻却故意一直备受争议。本文试从认识内容、分类方式,处理原则等角度比较两岸事实错误之规定,寻求完善事实错误规定的途径。
The factual error theory has always held an important position in criminal law theory. The behavior of the subjective and objective reality of the subjective inconsistencies occur from time to time and a wide range of different types of behavior, the fact that the error can stop deliberately has been controversial. This article attempts to compare the provisions of the actual errors in the two sides of the Strait from the perspectives of understanding, classification and treatment principles, and seeks ways to improve the erroneous provisions on facts.