论文部分内容阅读
怎么看历史,怎么看现实,怎么看毛泽东,这是一个理论问题,也是一个方法问题。在分析、解决问题过程中,方法是非常重要的。方法不对头,也会导致理论上的失误。2011年第4期《书屋》刊登一篇题为《告别激进主义》的文章,应该肯定文章的立论是好的:反对左的和右的、革命的和民主的、经济的和文化的形形色色的激进主义,赞成渐进主义,主张通过改革解决现实存在的问题,不折腾,维护社会稳定。这是完全正确的。但是,由于分析、解决问题方法的片面性和表面性,导致对某些问题的论述背离了马克思主义。本文拟从唯物辩证法的视角,对文章的三个观点作些具体分析。不当之处,请予指正。
How to see history, how to see the reality, how to see Mao Zedong, this is a theoretical issue, but also a methodological issues. In analyzing and solving problems, the method is very important. Wrong method, will lead to theoretical mistakes. In the fourth issue of 2011, Bookstore publishes an article entitled “Farewell to Radicalism.” It should be affirmed that the article’s argument is good: Opposition to left and right, revolutionary and democratic, economic and cultural Radicalism, in favor of gradualism, advocates the solution of the existing problems through reform, does not toss around, and maintain social stability. This is absolutely correct. However, due to the one-sidedness and superficial nature of the method of analysis and solution, the discussion of certain issues has deviated from Marxism. This article intends to make a concrete analysis of the three views of the article from the perspective of materialist dialectics. Inappropriate place, please correct me.