论文部分内容阅读
在日本禁止垄断法中,“市场支配力”是解释“实质性限制竞争”这一必要条件时提出的一个概念,确立“实质性限制竞争”这一解释基础的是高等法院对东宝斯巴鲁案件的判决和高等法院对东宝、新东宝案件的判决。关于哪种行为属于不当排除等,不同案件采取了不同的解释,从以前的决定、判决等来看,对于不当排除行为很难划定一个明确的界限。最近欧洲委员会发布的讨论稿,根据过去的事例指出了向明确化努力的方向。
In Japan’s Monopoly Law, “market power ” is a concept that is proposed when explaining the necessary condition for “substantial restraint of competition ”, establishing the basis for the interpretation of “substantial restraint of competition” Judgment of the court on the Dongba Subaru case and Judgment of the High Court on Dongbao and Shinsei Dongbao cases. In regard to what kind of conduct is improperly excluded and so on, different interpretations have been adopted in different cases. Judging from previous decisions and judgments, it is very difficult to draw a clear line of demarcation. A recent discussion paper issued by the European Commission has pointed out the direction of efforts towards clarity based on past examples.