本文旨在探讨《墨经》说“悖”。通过对悖论之“悖”还是“二难”之“言孛”的分析,指出“罗素悖论”等若干悖论并不是悖论。笔者把悖论命题中的变元数量作为划分悖论的标准,从《墨经》中存在的一元悖论、二元悖论拓展到多元悖论。并用命题逻辑的形式分析方法,证明《墨经》所及悖论的类别以及悖论的虚假属性,力求理性地识别悖论和揭穿悖论劣根性的本质,把悖论从似乎具有合理身份的成员中彻底清除。 The purpose of this article is to explore the theory of Mojing and the Paradox. Through the analysis of the “paradox” or “dilemma” of the “paradox” or “the dilemma”, this paper points out that some paradoxes such as “Russell Paradox” are not paradoxes. The author regards the number of arguments in the paradox proposition as the criterion for dividing the paradox and extends from the unary paradox and the dual paradox existing in Mohist Canon to the plural paradox. Proof logic is used to prove the category of the paradox and the false attributes of the paradox. It attempts to rationally identify the paradox and reveal the essence of the paradox of paradox. From the point of view of the paradox, In the complete removal.