论文部分内容阅读
既判力指确定的终局判决所裁判的诉讼标的对当事人和法院的强制性适用力,主要包括主观范围、客观范围。在代位权诉讼中,中国目前法律对既判力的主观范围和客观范围未进行规定,故应从以下方面进行完善,既判力的主观范围不应以债权人是否胜诉为前提,法院就代位权本身所作的判断应成为免证事实,法院就代位权诉讼标的所作的生效裁判应具有确定性。
The res judicata refers to the mandatory application of the litigant’s subject matter of the final judgment to the parties and the court, including the subjective range and the objective range. In the subrogation proceedings, China’s current law does not stipulate the subjective and objective scope of the res judicata. Therefore, it should be perfected from the following aspects. The subjective scope of the res judicata should not be based on whether the obligee wins or not. The court’s judgment on the subrogation Become a warrantless fact, the court made the subject of subrogation litigation effective referee should have certainty.