论文部分内容阅读
周俊杰先生的《“回归”不等于“保守”》(《书法导报》2003年)一文道出了欲说之话,然又觉得意犹未尽,同时亦对书坛的理论、评选导向及发展趋势忧心忡忡。我认为有必须从认识上进一步明确以下几点: 第一,书法评选应矫枉而不应该过正。书法评选对创作实践具有非常敏感的导向作用。事实上,目前所言书法创作的回归既有舆论、评选导向的作用,亦是创作实践自身探索而自然消长的结果。但总有一种感觉就是书
Mr. Zhou Junjie’s “Return” is not equal to “Conservative”” (Calligraphy Herald, 2003). The article tells the story, but then feels that it is still not complete. At the same time, he is also worried about the theories, selection orientation and development trend of the book. I think we must further clarify the following points from the understanding: First, calligraphy selection should be correct rather than overcorrect. Calligraphy selection has a very sensitive guiding role in creative practice. In fact, the return of the current calligraphic writing has both the role of public opinion and selection guidance, and it is also the result of the natural growth of the practice itself. But there is always a feeling that the book