论文部分内容阅读
目的了解城乡籍兵员群体间人格因素的优势与差异,为我军兵员的科学管理提供依据。方法以cat-tellRB16项人格因素问卷(16PF)作为测量工具,测试由专业人员按统一的指导语实施,限定60分钟内完成,超时为无效测试。遵循16PF的标定记分方法和标定公式,在计算出16项根源性人格因素得分的基础上,再分别计算得出4项二级因素和4项综合评估结果。结果在“稳定性、有恒性、敢为性、敏感性、幻想性、实验性、自律性”7因素上城乡籍士兵群体间具有显著性差异(P<0.05,P<0.01)。农村籍兵员较之城市籍兵员在“稳定性、有恒性、敢为性、自律性”因素上具有显著优势;城市籍兵员在“敏感性、幻想性、实验性、焦虑性”因素上得分显著高于农村籍兵员。结论城乡籍兵员间人格因素存在群因素差异,在管理中应体现差异性。
Objective To understand the advantages and differences of personality factors between urban and rural resident soldiers and to provide basis for the scientific management of our soldiers. Methods The cat-tellRB16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) was used as the measurement tool. The test was conducted by professionals according to a unified guideline and was limited to 60 minutes. The timeout was invalid. Following 16PF calibration score method and calibration formula, 16 secondary factors and 4 comprehensive evaluation results were calculated on the basis of calculating the scores of 16 primary personality factors. The results showed that there was a significant difference (P <0.05, P <0.01) among soldiers in urban and rural areas on the factors of stability, constant, daring, sensitivity, fantasy, experimentality and self-discipline. There is a significant advantage over the factors of “stability, constant, daring, and self-discipline” among the officers and soldiers of rural cadres over the urban cadres. The urban cadres have obvious advantages in the aspects of “sensitivity, fantasy, experimentality and anxiety” Factor score was significantly higher than that of rural cadres. Conclusion Personality factors between urban and rural residents have differences in group factors, which should be reflected in the management.