以往学者在探讨朱子理学与古典儒家礼教的关系时,往往侧重强调二者的差异性,而较少关注二者的承继关系。本文认为,朱子理学的形成在很大程度上是源于他对于古代礼教在当时已丧失之状况的回应,朱子的宗旨是重建古代礼教,而不是另创一种新异的哲学,只不过,当时由于社会环境的改变,他的诠释与重建也必然在传统礼教的基础上对其有所增损。朱子理学对于传统礼教而言,更多的是增补的作用,而非取代。由此我们也可以更深入地了解清代礼理之辨的实质。 In the past, scholars often focused on emphasizing the difference between the two while neglecting the succession relationship between Zhu and Neo-Confucianism. This article argues that the formation of Zhu’s Neo-Confucianism came largely from his response to the loss of ancient etiquette at that time. The purpose of Zhu was to rebuild the ancient etiquette instead of creating a new and different philosophy. However, At that time, due to the change of social environment, his interpretation and reconstruction also inevitably increased on the basis of traditional ethics. Zhu Neo-Confucianism is more of a supplement, not a substitute for traditional ethics. From this we can also understand more deeply the essence of the ethics of the Qing Dynasty.