日本财产开示制度及其对我国的启示

来源 :司法改革论评 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:lxj13050621544
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
财产开示制度是日本《民事执行法》新设立的制度。日本于1979年制定《民事强制执行法》时,认为德国法上的财产开示制度具有对人执行的嫌疑,因而未引进该制度。2003年7月,为确保债权实现的实效性,日本颁布了《为改善担保物权及民事执行制度而修改民法等一部的法律》,该法于2004年4月1日开始实施。根据这项法律,日本《民事执行法》导入了财产开示制度。~①本文试图解析日本财产开示程序的主要内容,然后分析我国被执行人财产报告制度的利弊,最后以日本财产开示制度为启示,提出完善我国财产报告制度的建议。 Property disclosure system is Japan’s “Civil Enforcement Act,” the newly established system. When Japan enacted the Civil Enforcement Law in 1979, it considered that the system of disclosure of property in German law was suspicious of the execution of people and was not introduced into the system. In July 2003, to ensure the effectiveness of the claims, Japan promulgated the “Law Amending the Civil Law, etc. to Improve the Security Interests and Civil Enforcement System,” which came into effect on April 1, 2004. According to this law, Japan’s “Civil Enforcement Act” introduced the system of property disclosure. This article attempts to analyze the main contents of Japan’s property disclosure procedures, and then analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the property rights reporting system of our country’s executives. At last, with the enlightenment of Japan’s property disclosure system, this paper puts forward suggestions on how to improve our country’s property reporting system.
其他文献
容许构成要件错误的刑事责任认定之所以存在诸多争议,由其自身性质难以为刑法错误归类所决定,也为犯罪论体系、故意的体系性位置以及故意确定范围等各自具有争议,并不统一的
“非法行医”在审判实务中表现极其复杂且形态多样。最高人民法院颁布的《关于审理非法行医刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》中规定了五种非法行医类型,认定非法行医与