论文部分内容阅读
后现代法学思潮的兴起标志着当代法哲学思维的一次重大转向,它主张视角多元和反本质主义,不承认法律具有固定的含义和本质,认为法律的普遍性是虚拟的宏观话语,反对普适主义的超验法律观。从价值的观点看,后现代法学采取一种更加开放和自由的方式来界定正义,强调微观的、具体的、实践的正义,从而对司法活动提出了新的审视。由此,在法治建设中出现了诸如程序本位与正义的冲突,如何向弱势群体运送正义等问题。后现代主义的新思潮有助于我们对以往的正义观进行反思,启发我们给正义标准以现实的人文关怀,以便更好地推进我国的法治建设。
The rise of the post-modern legal jurisprudence symbolizes a major shift in the thinking of contemporary legal philosophy. It advocates diversity of perspectives and anti-essentialism. It does not admit that the law has a fixed meaning and essence. It holds that the universality of law is a virtual macroscopic discourse, Transcendental legal view of law. From a value point of view, postmodern jurisprudence adopts a more open and free way to define justice and emphasizes micro, concrete and practical justice, thus putting forward a new look at judicial activities. As a result, issues such as the conflict between procedural standard and justice and how to deliver justice to underprivileged groups have emerged in the construction of the rule of law. The new trend of post-modernism helps us to reflect on the previous concept of justice and inspire us to give a realistic humanistic consideration to the standard of justice in order to better promote the building of the rule of law in our country.