论文部分内容阅读
一长期以来,在鲁迅《野草》研究领域,对《过客》的研究,大都偏重于思想的探索,而忽略艺术的剖析,即使在一些蜻蜓点水式的艺术分析的文字中,也出现了种种误解或曲解。有不少学者认为“这是对话体的散文”(如唐弢先生等),或说“这是一出发人深思扣人心弦的独幕剧”(江苏人民出版社:《鲁迅散文选讲》),更有甚者,某位颇有影响的教授,对包括《过客》在内的《野草》中十六篇散文诗,则论定为“是不纯粹的,它不是审美的”,从而从形式上否定了《野草》,说“这不是一部散文诗集。”由此,可见研究者们,对于鲁迅
For a long time, in the research field of Lu Xun’s “Wild Grass”, the research on “passing passengers” mostly focused on the exploration of ideas, and neglected the analysis of art. Even in the words of some water-based artistic analysis, there have been various misunderstandings. Misinterpretation. Many scholars believe that “this is an interlocutor’s prose” (such as Mr. Tang Yu, etc.), or that “this is an exciting one-shot drama for people to think deeply” (Jiangsu People’s Publishing House: “Selected Works of Lu Xun’s Essays”), and more Worse, one of the most influential professors, arguing that 16 prose poems in The Weeds, including Passing, was “not pure, it is not aesthetic,” thus negating formally. The “Wild Grass” said, “This is not a prose poetry.” Thus, we can see that researchers have