關於■之構形,目前主要存在兩種不同的說法。一種即《說文》許慎之說,把■視爲象脊吕之形的象形字,此爲舊說;新說則將■視爲束之訛變。新說可以劉釗先生之說爲代表(詳後),黄德寬先生~([1])、《戰國古文字典》~([2])、《字源》~([3])等觀點相同。新說提出之後,有不少學者仍堅持舊說,其中楊澤生先生《談出土秦漢文字“脊”和“責”的構形》一文~([4])(下簡稱“楊文”)重申許說,也同時對劉說提出一些質疑,較有影 There are mainly two different versions of the formation of ■. One that is “said the text” Xu Shenzhi said the ■ considered as the shape of the ridge of the hieroglyphics, this is the old saying; the new doctrine will be regarded as the beam of false change. New ideas can be said on behalf of Mr. Liu Zhao (detailed after), Mr. Huang Dekuan ~ ([1]), “Sengoku classical dictionary” ([2]), “source” ~ ([3]) and other points of view the same. After the new article was put forward, many scholars still insist on the old saying that Mr. Yang Zesheng “talked about the configuration of the characters” ridges “and” Text ") reiterated that Liu also made some questions at the same time, more influential