论文部分内容阅读
《哥达纲领批判》中关于共产主义社会不同阶段,尤其是它的第一阶段的论述,我认为有重新探讨的必要。因为用明确的语言较为集中地谈论这个问题,这在马克思主义文献中是仅见的。自列宁的《国家与革命》以一章(第五章)的篇幅详加阐发以来,它就被公认为研究社会主义社会最具有权威性的经典。多少年来,人们围绕着这些论述,一再进行解说、考证乃至发挥,争论不休。后人如此重视马克思的这一理论遗产,是出于社会主义建设的需要,因此是可以理解的。
In the Critique of the Gotha Program, the discussion on the different stages of communist society, especially its first phase, I think it is necessary to revisit it. This is a problem that is seen in the Marxist literature because it focuses more on clear language. Since Lenin's “State and Revolution” elaborated the chapter by chapter (Chapter V), it has been widely recognized as the most authoritative classic in the study of socialism. In the past few years, people have repeatedly argued, verified and even played out these arguments and debated endlessly. It is understandable that future generations should attach importance to this theoretical legacy of Marxism out of the need of socialist construction.