学术争鸣乃是本刊高扬的旗帜。回首“文革”前的史学界,诸如关于资本主义萌芽问题、关于生产力性质问题、关于时代精神汇合论问题、关于红学索隐派问题、关于让步政策问题、关于曹操的历史功过问题、关于忠王李秀成自述问题、关于中国近代史基本线索问题、关于封建社会分期问题等等的争鸣层出不穷。然而,时下史学界过于沉闷。值此纪念戊戌维新105周年之际,本期特刊发马洪林先生的争鸣文章,以期引起争论,为学术园地增辉添彩。 ——编者 Academic contestation is the banner of our magazine. Looking back to the history of the “Cultural Revolution” historians, such as on the germination of capitalism, on the nature of the issue of productivity, on the spirit of the convergence of the times, on the red school cable hidden problems, on the concession policy issues, on Cao Cao’s historical merits, on the loyalty Wang Li Xiucheng self-report problems, on the basic clues to modern Chinese history, the issue of the staging of the feudal society and so on after another contention. However, the current history of science is too boring. In commemoration of the 105th anniversary of the Hundred Days Reform, this special issue of Mr. Ma Honglin’s essay contests, with a view to arousing controversy and adding luster to the academic field. --editor